OCPP-J 2.0.1

OCPP J 2.0.1 Security Testing and Validation

The Open Charge Point Protocol version J 2.0.1 (OCPP J 2.0.1) is a widely used standard for communication between electric vehicle charging stations and central management systems. This updated version of the protocol includes clarified message formats, extended features and enhanced support for modern use cases. A central system and a charge point exchange messages to coordinate charging sessions, handle status events and report transactions. Because these interactions involve operational actions, billing events and status updates, vulnerabilities in message handling or session logic can lead to unauthorised access, incorrect actions, denial of service or data inconsistency.

At CyTAL we provide comprehensive protocol aware security testing for OCPP J 2.0.1 implementations using our ProtoCrawler platform. We analyse message parsing, session and connection handling, authentication processes, state transitions, error recovery and resilience under abnormal or malicious conditions. Our aim is to help you find and remediate weaknesses before your implementation is used in real world charging deployments.


What Is OCPP J 2.0.1

OCPP J 2.0.1 describes structured message exchanges between a charge point and a central system using WebSocket transport. The protocol defines the format and sequence for messages related to:

  • Session establishment and teardown

  • Charging session negotiation and control

  • Status reporting and configuration changes

  • Transaction records and diagnostics

  • Error reporting and recovery

By standardising these exchanges, OCPP J 2.0.1 enables charge points from multiple vendors to interoperate with central systems reliably.


Architecture and Attack Surface

OCPP J 2.0.1 implementations include multiple areas where security issues can arise. These include message handling, connection and session logic, authentication, state management and error processing.

Message Parsing and Field Validation

The central system and charge point must interpret many message types. Vulnerabilities arise when:

  • Field formats or field lengths are not validated correctly

  • Unexpected or malformed messages are accepted instead of being rejected

  • Optional fields are processed without validation

  • Data types are not checked before use

Weak message validation can lead to logic errors, incorrect decisions or system faults.

Session and Connection Handling

OCPP uses WebSockets for persistent communication between endpoints. Weaknesses may occur when:

  • Unauthenticated connections are accepted

  • Session identifiers are accepted without proper validation

  • Session state is not cleaned up after disconnect

  • Reconnect behaviour is inconsistent or insecure

These issues can lead to unauthorised connections or unstable session behaviour.

Authentication and Authorisation Logic

OCPP supports different methods for authenticating charge points and central systems. Risks include:

  • Weak or missing authentication checks

  • Acceptance of expired or invalid credentials

  • Storing authentication secrets insecurely

  • Ignoring failed authentication attempts

Poor authentication logic can allow unauthorised systems to interact with trusted endpoints.

State Management and Workflow Logic

OCPP defines specific sequences of actions that both sides must follow. Vulnerabilities may occur when:

  • Messages are accepted out of order

  • Invalid state transitions are not prevented

  • Error handling is incomplete

  • Workflow steps are skipped or misordered

Incorrect state handling can lead to inconsistent system behaviour or unintended outcomes.

Transport Layer Behaviour

OCPP implementations must handle the underlying transport reliably. Common issues include:

  • Incorrect handling of partial frames or fragmented messages

  • Lack of protection against connection floods

  • Failure to enforce TLS options where used

  • Misinterpretation of unexpected control messages

Transport level weaknesses can expose implementations to denial of service or unexpected losses of connectivity.


Common Vulnerabilities in OCPP J 2.0.1 Implementations

From research and testing in production scenarios, commonly observed issues include:

  • Parsing logic that accepts malformed messages

  • Incorrect field validation leading to unsafe processing

  • Insecure session handling that allows stale sessions to persist

  • Weak authentication acceptance allowing unauthorised endpoints

  • State machine errors that accept out of sequence messages

  • Transport layer faults that result in disconnections or resets

  • Lack of detailed logs for abnormal or repeated failures


Testing OCPP J 2.0.1 Implementations with ProtoCrawler

ProtoCrawler is a protocol aware testing platform that covers all aspects of OCPP J 2.0.1 functionality under normal and adversarial conditions.

Structured Message Generation and Mutation

We generate valid OCPP J 2.0.1 message sequences and then introduce controlled mutations such as:

  • Missing required fields

  • Corrupted or unexpected values

  • Duplicate or out of order messages

  • Unsupported or unknown message parts

This tests the implementation’s ability to validate and reject incorrect inputs.

Session and Connection Behaviour Tests

ProtoCrawler tests connection and session logic including:

  • Repeated connection attempts

  • Invalid identifiers

  • Abnormal disconnect and reconnect patterns

  • Concurrent session attempts

This confirms whether session logic is robust and secure.

Authentication and Access Control Evaluation

We test authentication mechanisms by providing:

  • Invalid credentials

  • Expired or malformed tokens

  • Replayed authentication attempts

  • Attempts to skip authentication

This ensures that only authorised systems can interact with the implementation.

State Transition and Workflow Tests

ProtoCrawler verifies state machine behaviour by sending:

  • Messages before expected states are established

  • Repeated or skipped transitions

  • Conflicting sequences

  • Mixed valid and invalid workflows

This checks whether the implementation enforces correct sequencing and state rules.

Transport Stress Testing

We simulate heavy transport level activity to test resilience under:

  • Large volumes of connections

  • Partial frames and unexpected segmentation

  • Rapid repeated messages

  • Connection floods

This highlights potential denial of service and stability issues.

Regression and Continuous Integration Support

ProtoCrawler can be integrated into development and test pipelines so that every code or configuration change is automatically validated for security and behaviour. This prevents regressions and maintains quality over time.


Best Practices for Secure OCPP J 2.0.1 Deployments

Strict Message Validation

Validate every incoming message against expected structure and content before processing.

Authentication and Authorisation Controls

Enforce authentication checks consistently. Reject expired, malformed or unknown credentials. Protect authentication secrets securely.

Session State Management

Manage sessions carefully. Clean up state after disconnect and reject invalid session identifiers.

State Machine Enforcement

Follow defined protocol workflows strictly. Reject messages that are not permitted in the current state.

Transport Hardening

Handle partial frames, enforce secure configurations such as TLS where used and protect against connection floods.

Rate Limiting and Abuse Protection

Apply limits to connection and message rate to prevent resource exhaustion and abuse.

Logging and Monitoring

Log connection events, validation failures and unusual patterns. Use alerts to detect repeated abnormalities.


Frequently Asked Questions About OCPP J 2.0.1 Security Testing

Q: Why is OCPP J 2.0.1 testing important
Because the protocol manages important system and control information. Weak implementations can allow incorrect behaviour or unauthorised access.

Q: Can message parsing faults cause failures
Yes. Incorrect parsing can lead to misinterpretation or unsafe processing of incoming data.

Q: Does ProtoCrawler support testing OCPP over TLS
Yes. ProtoCrawler can test OCPP implementations over a variety of transport and security configurations.

Q: How often should implementations be tested
At minimum before deployment, after configuration changes and after any library or code updates.


Secure Your OCPP J 2.0.1 Implementation with CyTAL

OCPP J 2.0.1 is an essential protocol for modern charging infrastructure. CyTAL’s ProtoCrawler platform delivers deep, protocol aware testing that uncovers parsing flaws, authentication weaknesses, session logic faults and transport issues before they affect production systems.

Contact us to arrange a demonstration or to discuss how we can help secure your OCPP J 2.0.1 implementation.